Finance and Economics Discussion Series (FEDS)
July 2025
Trading Costs v. Indicative Liquidity in the Off-the-Run Treasury Market
Abstract:
This paper estimates trading costs in the off-the-run Treasury market using comprehensive transactions data and machine learning techniques. The analysis reveals several key findings that enhance the understanding of the off-the-run Treasury market liquidity. First, the indicative bid-ask spread is shown to be a biased measure of liquidity, even when not considering transaction volume. Specifically, bid-ask spreads systematically overstate trading costs of more seasoned Treasuries, and the liquidity of benchmark, on-the-run securities affects how off-the-run bid-ask spreads map to trading costs. Second, the paper demonstrates that trading costs may scale non-monotonically with transaction volume, which suggests selective, opportunistic liquidity-taking. Additionally, transaction size has greater effect on off-the-run securities’ trading costs when benchmark, on-the-run liquidity is lower. Finally, indicative bid-ask spreads may notably overstate trading costs for larger orders of relatively less liquid securities. These findings contribute to our understanding of actual liquidity in the off-the-run Treasury market, while highlighting the limitations of a traditional liquidity measure. By providing a more nuanced view of trading costs, this study contributes valuable insights for supporting financial stability and optimal asset allocation.
Keywords: liquidity, Treasury market, off-the-run, effective bid-ask spread
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17016/FEDS.2025.049
PDF: Full Paper
Disclaimer: The economic research that is linked from this page represents the views of the authors and does not indicate concurrence either by other members of the Board's staff or by the Board of Governors. The economic research and their conclusions are often preliminary and are circulated to stimulate discussion and critical comment. The Board values having a staff that conducts research on a wide range of economic topics and that explores a diverse array of perspectives on those topics. The resulting conversations in academia, the economic policy community, and the broader public are important to sharpening our collective thinking.